Does Anyone Think Steroids Should Be Allowed In Sports?

Whats wrong with players looking like Ahnold hitting 100 homers a year(thats what we go to see)...in this day and age, why not slap a disclamer on the roids...like cigerettes and see what happens...bigger players in football and baseball what do you think?

2007-12-19 05:10:07 Sharita-Pycroft says:

• no they should not be allowed.
• maybe you go to see someone hitting 100 homers, but i go to see a good contest between the two teams or contenders.
• when they take drugs, i'm not seeing the true talent of the teams/contenders, i'm seeing just a bunch of hype caused by drugs sports illustrated calendar models.
• that is not what i paid to see.
• if a guy has to take drugs to do spectacular things, then it's not worth watching him sports illustrated calendar models.
• also, the drugs harm the contenders bodies and minds.
• they are harming themselves, and the price they will pay may be way too high.
• allowing drugs and putting disclaimers on them isn't going to produce any real changes.
• it'll just mean more sports contenders will take them and harm their bodies and possibly kill themselves because they don't have enough pride in their natural talents; they think they have to be superman to be worthwhile, and that's just a bunch of tripe.
• i want to enjoy seeing a competition of human competitors, not a fake competition of a bunch of drugs, and if they're on drugs, i'm not seeing what they can do...
• only what the drugs do to them and with them sports illustrated calendar models.
• i don't pay good money to go watch a bunch of drug addicts.

2007-12-19 05:03:17 Douglass-Bratton says: The biggest reason to me is the example they set for kids. A number of kids have been injured severely or died while using steroids. They use them because their sports heroes use them. this is really the primary motivator for the congressional investigation.

2007-12-19 05:06:21 Terence-Moonshower says: i do let them use what ever they want***